Thursday, March 4, 2010

The mechanics part 1

Trade deadline is the perfect time to look into team building mechanics and the many obvious myths associated with certain methods. I often read seasoned sports journalists who seem to cater to the unrelenting crowd of alarmists that make-up a good part of the Habs fan base. While the former get lost in their entitlement to their opinions forgoing an intelligent analysis, only reinforcing the latter's need to, well, worry. It's all nice and giddy when you want to sell something, as catering to target crowds is the cornerstone of any good marketing scheme, but I on the other hand am not interested in ratings here.

I look at the Habs presently, and all I can do is be very enthusiastic about seeing this team go forward in the next few years. The reasons for this are simple, but aren't inherently obvious for some. My expectations are the same as any Habs fan and I don't even need to say what it is. Since we are not and will never be in a market where we can tank a season on purpose, and such a window of oppurtunity, if it ever existed, was forfeited over a decade ago, then the obvious path is that of long-term team building. This is what the Habs have chosen to do instead of tanking, over a decade ago.

Long-term team building requires patience and flexibility. It all starts with the draft and player development, obviously, but the mechanic goes much further than this. Players have to be cycled/renewed for replacements by youth, or sometimes for need. This is what we've seen from the Habs in the last 5-6 seasons. The building blocks have been added, replacing underperforming or underacheiving players, while filling holes for short periods at positions which they hadn't developed a player yet, and now that we have a constant stream of good players making their way into the team, more and more positions are getting filled internally. The secret of success doesn't lie in drafting a phenom like Crosby or Ovechkin, and mostly only teams who can afford to tank can do that. The secret lies in keeping a focus on the objectives, and keep progressing towards renewing the old with the new and better.

What is truly missing to the Habs? So many answers could be given, always depending on what one thinks is the right formula to win. Personally, I don't think it's as straight forward as many think it is. I look at the Habs, and I let go of my preferences, and rather try to see what is being done, what is their plan. With each year that goes by, I see less and less holes to fill on the team, and the team also seems to be getting younger. It's a process, and so far its going well. People will pretend the opposite, because they only care for their expectations, for results, which have to be immediate, they forget to stop for a second and appreciate what is being done.

When we reach trade deadline, it's the same old story every year. Angry fans who didn't get their candy. A minority of teams get success from deadline trades, and that success is short term at the very best. The reality of the salary cap makes it even harder for teams to make transactions than it was in the pre-cap era. Whatever trade could've happened, to me, would have been nothing compared to the excitement of seeing a player like Subban come up and impress the hell out of most. We are finally at a point where we are adding important players internally at every position. Why screw this up with an overpayment on the trade market right smack in the middle of a transition season?

If there is a need to fill, and since this is a team with a stream of renewal of players with youth who don't cost much, then the obvious way to do so would be through the free agency market, as you don't need to let go of assets you'd rather keep. I've always been of the opinion that the trade market should be used for securing assets for players who you will lose and don't need in the short term, or to fill a need that you can't presently fix with either prospects or free agency. Or obviously, if an offer that is too tempting comes along, which is rare. But for any of those, I don't tend to think that trade deadline is the best time to do so. The off-season offers much more wiggle room.

14 comments:

  1. All this drivel just to further reinforce the notion that you're a blind optimist with practically zero hockey acumen. You really should just let it go. Dust off your pom poms sweetheart, because you're nothing more than a cheerleader. This team isn't going anywhere and anyone involved in professional hockey will support my stance. Thanks for playing though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well anonymous, now you just look stupid because the author of this blog is not me. The fact that you come on here and repeat the same trash you spread in the other comments section clearly shows you are trolling.

    If the team sucks so bad, don't watch it. Go watch the big bad leafs with grit and size who will finish last place without a first round pick

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent analysis. I agree with what you say, it seems as though the majority of people that are complaing because they just wanted to see a trade, but our management has made several this year.

    They brought in Pouliot, Moore and Palushaj.

    The guy "anonymous" is a loser, he's clearly just trying to stir up stuff and get the authors of the blog angry. While he makes for great discussion because you don't want to have a uniformed opinion, he just comes off as arrogant, jealous and condescending which makes him lose his credibility.

    What's even funnier is that he makes of the blog and comes back and takes the time out of life to post on it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You know who failed at the trade deadline? Peter freaking Chiarelli. No attack. Sure, we have a draft to look forward to, but he failed to improve this team now. Poor Marc Savard.

    It's a good thing the Habs didn't trade Price or Halak. It's going to be a fun off-season.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Man treadline is hard for all teams because you really do want to see your GM make a move to better your team, but sometimes the best move is the move you don't make. I think Chiarelli improved his D by getting Seidenberg, too bad they couldn't get a top 6 forward.

    But the Bruins have a lot to look forward to Claudio. They'll have a top 3 pick almost guarenteed and can move their other 1st round pick at the draft. I expect the Bruins to be a strong team next year.

    I agree with you about this upcoming offseason. I think it's going to be really interesting. Burke will be desperate to acquire a first, I see Kaberle finally getting moved. Boston will definately do something at the draft. Montreal pretty much has no choice because they have to make some cap space.

    It looks like the North East is going to be yet again the toughest division in the league.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm very much aware of who the fool responsible for that failed analysis of the Habs is. This team, given the roster that they have, will always live and die with their goaltending. We have two of the best young goaltenders in the league and yet people are infatuated with this controversy that has arisen between the pipes. All this to say that people are focusing too much on the best aspect of our team, while ignoring that our defence is atrocious and our forward core scares NOBODY. Halak and Price are potential top-10 goalies in this league. That does not make up for the fact that we have 13+ million tied up in second liners like Gionta and Gomez for the next half decade. Add that to the fact that our best forward is set to be an UFA in a few months and anyone with an ounce of knowledge of the NHL knows that this team is in an unfortunate position. This is not an opinion, it's a fact. Anyone even thinking otherwise is a foolish blowhard and the results put them back into the corner where the belong. Again, I appreciate you attempting to step up to my level... but you just can't hang with the big boys, son.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Haha, anonymous, don't go away, you are a riot. Your points would be taken much more seriously if you wouldn't be so condescending.

    The only problem I have with your tone is that you make it seem as though everything is set in stone and that you have things all figured out. You sound a lot like Lafleurs Guy of Hfboards(maybe you are).

    It's clear tanking is not an option in Montreal. Moreover, it's even clearer that tanking doesn't even guarentee having a contending team for year. Look at teams like St.Louis Columbus and Florida who are terrible each and every year and are always sellers at the deadline who draft high.

    Building a team is not a science. I think most of the problem in Montreal is the coaching style and not the group of players we have aside from a few outlyers. Our top 6 is very strong when healthy and like Brain Burke has said "it doesn't matter how big your top 6 is, it's your bottom six that need to pick up the physical game."

    It's pretty clear that a salary will be moved this off-season, either Hamrlik's or Spacek's. Also it's pretty clear Plekanec will be signed or he would have been dealt at the deadline.

    Again, if you want to discuss, do so like a civilized human being and stop acting like you're some sort of expert hockey analyst because just like me you are a nobody who has a lot of fault in the reasoning and analysis of the game.

    I agree with you in some aspects, but don't in others. Stop acting like a jackass and talk properly without resorting to childish name calling, basically you get mad because people don't agree with your opinion, then why bother arguing. Write your own blog and comment on how amazing and right you are.

    There's still 17 games left in the season and anything can still happen.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As for hanging with the big boys, it seems like your the only one hanging as you approached this blog and not the other way around.

    Again, discussion is always great and having the otherside of the argument is always stimulating.

    I want anyone to comment on the blog and that's why I allow anonymous blogging, don't ruin for others who may want to write without having to create a google account.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Listen boy, I've already made it clear that you and your fellow boyfriend don't know nearly enough about the NHL for me to detail your incompetencies. Let it be known, however, that I run this blog. Without me, there's zero traffic and that is a fact. For you to maintain your stances after years of perpetual failure (by my standards, you know, someone who actually wants a respectable playoff contender) is outright pathetic, and I will call you two out on it whether you like it or not.

    Take that as you will, but it's further reinforcement that you and Ozy are completely worthless without me running the show. Assume the position, b!tches. Hahaha.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think "anonymous" is a lonely man. He's got nothing better to do than argue. It's funny that he keeps coming back to this blog and making comments. I bet he's stuck on his computer 24/7 lol. I agree with Andy, "anonymous" should just create his own blog and leave this one. ha

    ReplyDelete
  11. And speaking of Chiarelli (I'll make it brief) he failed to get what the Bruins have needed since the beginning of the year - scorer/finisher. I know the future is bright with draft picks and the prospects the Bruins have, but you can't miss an opportunity to help the team and blame it on excuses. The Bruins-Maple Leafs game last night was a clear example of how the Bruins season has gone this year - they cannot bury the puck in the next. It's gotten to the point where you just want to laugh - it's sad. Imagine how Marc Savad feels? He missed an open net last night - I have no idea how he missed it.

    The problem with the Habs is that they have too much 3rd 4th liners. Martin's system has taken longer to perfect than expected. Speed is Montreal's weapon and they should use it more often. The defense is still a problem - they don't really have a shut down pair (or am I missing something?). Their off-season should be interesting. They need to re-sign Plekanec, Halak and/or Price. I do believe they should sign one of the goalies and get a veteran backup. There will be an idiot that offers Halak a lot of money. In that case, depending the offer, the Habs can let Halak go and take the draft picks.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yawn Anonymous your act is getting old.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Your comment has no resonance with me because I'm actually a girl and I'm beautiful, so suck it. Try leaving your house once and a while it may do you some good and score you some friends...but maybe I'm being too optimistic...it is you we're talking about. No culture, no class, no upbringing. You're pure rot. Stop posting on this blog, you simply cheapen it and force others to do so as well in response to your antics.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well Anonymous, you like kind of stupid calling the gfame after 2-0. Now tha habs won and got 6 out 8 points on their four game road trip and are a little more comfortable in the standings.

    And dude, I really don't care about the traffic you generate, I could easily just get rid of the anonymous posting and not have you post anymore, but others don't have any google accounts so its unfair to them

    Stop whining.

    ReplyDelete